Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Natus-Šalamounová

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. One of several AFDs that seems to have been done too hastily. Geschichte (talk) 07:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Natus-Šalamounová

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Painter and proefssor with one print in a National Gallery. Not notable for our standards. Natus-Šalamounová does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV. Dr42 (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Dr42 (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I am seeing many mentions in Czech, and there is the museum collection, so GNG is likely met. Seeing as the nominator does not seem to do WP:BEFORE and has made two incorrect AfD nominations of notable artists today, I don't put much faith in this nomination.Possibly (talk) 18:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets WP:GNG as I'm getting enough hits on Google, news and books to establish that the notability of this illustrator exists even though the article needs improvement - WP:NEXIST (If I could read/translate Czech I'd improve it.) She is in the collection of the National Gallery of Art which also speaks to her notability, as they don't collect garbage art. ;) Netherzone (talk) 20:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Plenty of Czech-language sources; meets WP:GNG. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 21:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: "One print in a National Gallery" doesn't really capture the importance of being in the National Gallery of Art. — Toughpigs (talk) 06:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.